S: The speaker of this article is Harry Enten. As a writer Harry Enton covers a wide range of topics tht stem from politics to sports making him a very valuable contributor. The author crafts the article to express the possibility of 2018 Blue Wave using data analysis and rhetoric in a very well written article.
O: The article was written to convey a message to the reader about different "Blue States" which have the possibility of giving Democrats the majority in the upcoming 2018 midterm elections. Furthermore the article goes on to discuss the distribution of Clinton throughout the aforementioned states, and how these states will be a threat to the GOP's control on the House of Representative A: The audience are for those who are interested in the upcoming midterms such as political junkies, political writers, and any concerned or impassioned citizen. P: The purpose of the article is to accumulate evidence and justify the probable 2018 "Blue Wave" that we are going to see. Moreover the article seeks to educate the reader about the political science behind elections and why traditional blue states should matter to the Republicans. S: The subject is blue states, or states that vote for Democrats in different elections by wide margins. The article also focuses on the possibility of Democrats retaking the House in 2018 as a broader rejection of Trumpism and conservatism as a whole. The author also details about how passionate people win elections, and all signs point towards bluer than normal voting in those five states. T: The tone of the article is very factual while also being very real. The author seems to both educate and inspire as he portrays what could be a very boring subject. The overall article feels like a race and offers twists and explanations that do not always meet the eye. Overall it maintains a factual and educational tone while being an entertaining and fun read. Link to Original Article: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/five-blue-states-could-determine-who-controls-the-house-in-2018/
0 Comments
Speaker- The speaker of the article Carl Bialick who is a reporter and writer for Five Thirty Eight Occasion- This takes place in downtown New York City at a currency exchange booth right off of Broadway, which is quite common place to visit due to the number of foreign visItors in NYC. Audience- The audience are those interested in world travel or economics. It helps clear up a misconception that you get all your money back and is great for those learning or interested in economics. Purpose- The purpose is to see how many times you can exchange a dollar bill until the amount is to small to make any more exchanges while also educating the viewer on the ins and outs of currency exchange. Subject- The subject is currency exchanges and the price of "doing business" as far as exchanging different currency goes and what makes it fluctuate. Tone- The tone is very lighthearted and fun as how often does one get to burn one hundred dollars and do something very few people do while remaining factual and inquisitive throughout. Moderation: The sidelined views of 2012 replaced by the extremism of 2016Speaker: The speaker of the piece is Oliver Roeder a senior writer for the Five Thirty Eight, online multimedia platform. He writes on a plethora of different issues, but tends to focus on American politics and lifestyle.
Occasion: The occasion is the politically charged year of 2016 and its continued effects in 2017. This will likely be a mounting concern in the 2018 midterms. Furthermore the ideology of the Supreme Court is always under scrutiny and inspection as it is the check and balance on the legislative and executive branch. Anything more than a slight tilt could represent a skew in the direction towards party monopolization. Audience: The audiences are political analyzers and bipartisan watchdogs. They track these voting records in order to formulate their opinions and break down the idealogical shift in the court. Lawyers and state attorney generals use this to formulate pitches, and determine the validity and opportunity of their cases in the highest court in the United States Purpose: The purpose of the article is to break down the voting records and ideology of the Supreme Court in the terms of the American public. Using simple numerical values and terms, the general public can understand the article allow general citizens to understand one of the most powerful benches in America (Quite possibly greater than the bench in Savannah, where Forestt Gump delivered is Academy Award winning oratory about his REAL life). Subject: The subject is the Supreme Court and its shifting ideologies, and how it has and may affect our daily life. Tone: The tone is serious with a strictly analytical point of view that trends towards a semi-passion and general, light interest in the topic. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |